About your Search

20140226
20140306
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
for me. >> since president has been in office we have reached the point where cutting the annual deficit in half to reduce the overall debt of united states by $3 trillion over the next 10 years. neil: i heard that it stuck with me i immediately said he just out to an allied made ising the debt is coming down it will shrink $3 trillion over the next 10 years? it is what. what will happen is it will grow $3 trillion less than rethought. that is a big difference. said debt will grow at 21. 3 trillion that is not the but the cbo. it is not the $3 trillion decrease but $8 trillion increase may be sheikh factors in those savings but so far that does not mean fear is less red ink. but with washington less than we feared so no need to fear. not so fast. it is a twisted way that the senator says we're making progress. because if you define progress then you must be forgetting you are digging a hole consists of a. it is time for the wake-up call the debt is getting bigger. that is like me saying i m projected to gain 50 pounds over the next decade but i am only gaining four days so i lost 10 poun
with the incredible deficit and the size of government. >> we have a tax problem and a spendi problem. and it basically came to a grounding al. lou: what are you going to do about lois lerr? dirty have the attorney general in contempt. what are you going to do a former senior irs offcial? he's basically told you guys to buzz off. i have a bill, hrr 1950 that iminalizes this action. lou: retroactively? >> the questio is what are you going to do about lois lerner who has told you guys to buzz off. >> we are going to make certain that there are two aspects of the story are told. hold people accountable and find out who did this. and you move forward with the legislation that holds people accountable if it haapens again. and i think the american people are shocked at what has occurred at the irs that the administration is doing nothing and we are going to work diligentlto hold these people accountable to make re this doesn't happen again. lou: no one is a bbgger fan of darrell issa than i am. and i think you know that. you and your committee have done brilliant work. i do think that you r
has pron he took a deficit nowt i a surplus, rating agents have given us better marks. i tnk he is making progress in terms of environment and other issu. i question whether we need to devide the state to 6 pieces, but even if weid. the u.s. senate would have to apove the admission of 10 new senators. in to their body, diluting their power. why does senator fro nevada or alabama or ohio want to giv california 10 more senators? neil: his logic does make sense, at leastase level, thats that it is a very big state. unwieldy state,n so far as interests and you know even physical concts are very desperate throughout the state, i don't know that means you have to have 6 different states, butt makes it disfunctional. what do you make of that argument and why the 6 pieces? >>'t know why the 6 pieces we have n and south carolina, and north and south dakota, two states is possie, that was tried 1 in late 1850s, but. there is no way on earth that the u.s.ongress is going to dilute itsower and give more power to california. as you know they hate athing big, wre the bigge state, we tend to
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)